
Last Tuesday evening there was a documentary on BBC 3 entitled: ‘Deborah 13 – Servant of God’
Deborah is a 13 year old girl living in the depths of Dorset, on a remote farm, educated at home by her parents, with 8 other brothers and sisters (two others were living away from home) – and is a very fundamentalist evangelical Christian.
She has no tv or mobile phone (indeed if we are to believe the documentary, she has never ever watched tv!). She has no idea who Victoria Beckham or Britany Spears are (lucky girl!), and she has never shopped in Top Shop (nor, I have to confess, have I!). More significantly, perhaps, she has no friends of her own age in the locality.
Early in the interview she turned the tables on the interviewer, looked her in the eye, and said ‘Would you consider yourself to be a good person?’ To which the interviewer replied, ‘yes’. Deborah continued,
‘Have you ever told a lie?’
‘Yes’.
‘Have you ever stolen anything?’
‘Yes’.
‘Have you every used God’s name in vain?’
‘Yes’.
‘Have you ever coveted anything?’
‘Yes’.
‘So you’re a lying, thieving, coveting, blasphemous person! Do you still think you are a good person?’
She goes on, later in the programme, to make it quite clear that anyone who breaks any of the Ten Commandments, even a well-meant ‘white’ lie, is destined to hell! This sets the tone for the whole of the documentary.
I found the whole programme to be deeply disturbing. Disturbing to see someone so constrained by such rigorous religious views. Disturbing to see someone so out of touch with the rest of the world. But disturbing most of all because I felt there was something deeper within me that was disturbed, something I couldn’t quite properly pin down. I think it was something to do with her attitude to the Bible.
She says, in the course of the programme, that “the Bible is the infallible, inerrant, inspired word of the living God”. ‘Inspired’ I would agree with (although probably not interpreted in the same way as Deborah would have done so), but ‘infallible’ and ‘inerrant’ I could not accept. We won’t find either of those descriptions in Scripture itself – they are rather products of 16 century Reformation theology.
It is something about that ‘absolutist’, extreme ‘black & white’ attitude to Scripture that I find so difficult, and so disturbing – and so at odds with Jesus’ own attitude!
Compare, for instance, Deborah’s insistence that every single lie, no matter how small, no matter how well-meant, is a ticket to hell. This is law ‘out of context’, law applied without reference to circumstance or situation. Compare this to Jesus’ treatment of the woman caught in adultery in John’s gospel – a judgement tempered with compassion and love.
The teaching in the New Testament leads us, in the main, to seek the deeper source of the Law of God, rather than being almost sidetracked by its individual precepts. St Paul even goes as far as to say that Christ “has abolished the law with its commands and ordinances…” (Eph.2.15a nrsv). He’s not advocating no law – just a deeper, less definable, law.
We can see this in today’s gospel reading, where Jesus drives out the moneychangers and the animal dealers from the Temple. They were there because the Law required sacrifice and taxes, and that needed sheep and shekels: sacrificial victims and Hebrew money (rather than the Greek and Roman stuff.). But all that trapping had seemingly become a distraction that deflected the participants in temple worship from its truer, deeper, more spiritual aspects. Hence Jesus’ ‘zeal’!
All this, of course, means that we have to enter unchartered territory, that we have to leave behind the comfortable constraints of certainty – as expressed in the written law – and enter the, sometimes less sure, realms of the spirit.
Adherence to the law can never make us good – it just makes us compliant. And God wants more from us than that! In Jesus he expands and deepens our understanding of what it is that he requires of us, but doesn’t, thereby, make it any easier.
St Paul, in his letter to the Romans, wrestles with the implications of all this – it’s one of his major preoccupations (see Romans chapters 5-8, for example). He writes there (7.6)
“…the Law no longer rules over us.
Now we can serve God in a new way by obeying his Spirit,
and not in the old way by obeying the written Law.
…and again in 2 Corinthians (3.6)…
“[God] makes us worthy to be the servants of his new agreement
that comes from the Spirit and not from a written Law.
After all, the Law brings death, but the Spirit bring life.”
We are called to reach beyond and beneath the letter of the law, to discover the Spirit, to discover life in all its richness.
Deborah is clearly a bright, faithful, committed young girl, and, despite her own protestations to the contrary, a good person. But somehow I just can’t shake off the feeling that something is not quite right…


7 comments
Comments feed for this article
15 March 2009 at 5:24 pm
Steven Carr
Of course, the story of the woman taken in adultery is not in the early manuscripts, not mentioned by any church fathers for 3 centuries and is widely held to be not an original part of the Gospel.
The attitude to adultery in the New Testament is that you are an adulterer if you even so much as look at a woman lustfully.
I think Jesus would feel right at home with Deborah.
I wonder why Jesus, being god, commanded all those animal sacrifices, and demanded no pagan images , and then got upset by people changing Roman money, which had the Emperor’s head on it.
What did he expect to see in a Jewish Temple?
Did he expect to see people putting oil on their head when they fasted, as Jesus commanded?
15 March 2009 at 6:06 pm
Spideog
I think you’re probably right – but that only increases my feeling of being disturbed!
15 March 2009 at 10:40 pm
Sharon xx
Hi Spideog ~ I missed this and am quite sad that I did. I am fascinated by your writing on the matter and am equally disturbed at what you describe.
For me the extremes that can be witnessed in these cases are the stuff that gives religion per se a bad name. It feels like religion is being used to control, remove hope and emphasise sin. When really it should be about Deborah loving her neighbour as HERSELF [it seems from what you say that she has a very poor self image]. Also as our Priest said in today’s Homily it’s about not focussing on the negative words of the commandments ~ all the ‘thou shalt nots’ but turning them on their head and saying you CAN love God, you CAN love your neighbour, you CAN feel blessed and thankful for what you have and so on……
Where is God’s love in all this ~ I’m struggling to see it in Deborah’s life??
12Therefore, as God’s chosen people, holy and dearly loved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience. 13Bear with each other and forgive whatever grievances you may have against one another. Forgive as the Lord forgave you. 14And over all these virtues put on love, which binds them all together in perfect unity.
Collosians 3:12~14
This is what Deborah’s parents should be instilling into her, not all that hell and damnation stuff. Too scary for one so young.
Thank you so much for sharing this ~ I was quite inspired as you can tell.
pax et bonum
Sharon xx
16 March 2009 at 9:53 am
Sharon xx
ps ~ did you know she has a blog ~ here is the link ~
http://deborahdrapper.com/
~ she is a very inspired young lady but I’d still like to see the documentary to see if I can ’see’ and ‘feel’ what you saw and felt when you watched it.
take care
S xx
18 March 2009 at 9:05 pm
Sharon
Well, I’ve watched it and thank you so much for the links.
I’m still pretty much of the same opinion as you. Yes, she’s very commited and obviously loves our Dear Lord with a passion rarely seen in one so young.
I still wish there’d been more about God’s love [although editing has to be taken into account] and less hell and damnation. In my experience this approach rarely reaches people [souls], tends to create fear, anger and defensiveness more.
I still wish I’d seen her laugh and smile more.
I’d like to meet her again when her world has widened out because at the moment I think her world is a very ’small’ place, far removed from reality. No bad thing for one so young but not terribly useful when she’s assuming personal responsibility for the souls of others.
That brings me to my final concern….one of my daughters is 16. I would be very sad if she felt personally responsible for the souls of other people ~ far too much responsibility for someone that age. That’s a tall order for most Catholic priests never mind a 13 year old girl.
Agree with their thoughts on daycare etc. but not sure I would place my children in quite such a secluded spot. I’ve homeschooled my 3year old rather than send him to pre~school for the very same reasons but not to their extremes.
The whole thing reminded me a little bit of the American ‘Bible Belt’ child preachers that I saw a documentary on a few months ago and they too struggled under the strain a bit I felt.
All in all very thought provoking ~ thank you for sharing that with us.
pax et bonum
Sharon xx
13 April 2009 at 2:19 pm
Mrs.Pogle
I tired to post on this subject a while back,a nd ended up deeply upsetting someone (a dear friend) who follows the same lifestyle, but my concerns remain. I am ashamed to say that your entry is far more gracious than mine was! I may try to blog on this again at a later date…
I am liking your blog, and have added it to my blogroll
Mrs.P x
13 April 2009 at 3:21 pm
Spideog
Thank you, Mrs P.
Christus Surrexit, Alleluia!